DAY 1. ANDREW SUMMERS:
Well done, Andrew. Throughout your whole presentation I could tell that you had a real passion for both of your referenced texts. I have hear comparisons between C.S. Lewis book and the Bible before, but you did a really nice job of laying it all out and giving specific examples. I especially love the part when Aslan says, “By knowing me here for a little, you may know me better there.” That is such a great line. I love that you pointed out that all important, “I am” statement. I’m not sure if you noticed this but when Lucy says, “And oh, do, do, do, make it soon.” there is numerology intertextuality there. As you know, the number three has some very strong biblical ties and Lucy says ‘do’ three times. I loved the lamb and the fish references. In addition to the fishermen parts of the Bible it also reminded me of Christ feeding the 5000. If I could put your thesis in my own words, I think it would be this: C.S. Lewis writes Christian allegory and borrows Biblical themes for his Chronicles of Narnia. You had great perspective and confidence while you presented and I could tell that you had a real passion for both texts. P.S. Well done on the semi-colon question. I didn’t know those things at all…
DAY 2. NICOLE SCHILLEMAT
Nicole! Your essay title “Wickedness Never Was Happiness” is fabulous. Way to appeal to your audience. That was very smart to do and a great attention grabber for most of us. You had a great examples and quotes. I was very impressed, as I know you have not actually read Inferno. You seemed to be very knowledgeable on your subject and both of your texts, whether you were or not. I was very proud of you. I loved your “companion” example with Virgil and the Holy Ghost, I am not sure that I ever would have thought of that, but it totally and completely makes sense. What a great perspective to have. I also loved your ideas on repentance and the sinners. Overall, you made really great points and your ideas were well stated. Very well done.
DAY 3. CAELI TEW
Caeli, you were the only one to present on Tuesday, so I am forced to write about you. But let’s face it, I probably would have written about your presentation anyway. Through the points you read, I could easily identify the subject and main points of your essay. It was obviously about Virgil’s reflection of Odysseus in Aeneas. I liked your example of the heroes’ similar backgrounds and social standings. I hadn’t really considered that before. You made a really good statement when you said, “Virgil transformed it for his own use.” That is exactly what intertextuality is all about, and you obviously had a good handle on that. You did kind of just list off comparisons a lot of the time. They were great comparisons but I think what they want from the essay is why we can make these comparisons. I love that you said “they played house.” That was a funny was to put it, I chuckled to myself for a bit, but it totally makes sense. I think Dr. Silverman asked some really good questions to put your points into perspective. His questions were really helpful for me, so be sure to consider them.